I think floppy-disk and floppy-drive have sufficiently intertwined scopes that there is little sense in distinguishing between them. Either a floppy disk or a floppy drive is useful primarily in the presence of the other, so posts mentioning either will often talk about both. More importantly, someone knowledgeable about either will be probably knowledgeable about both – so both tags signify basically the same area of expertise and interest. The distinction does not matter for the primary purpose of tags: I can’t imagine anyone would want to put floppy-disk in their watched tags, but floppy-drive in their ignored tags or vice versa.
Having two separate tags is also inconsistent with how we treat other removable media:
- cd-rom covers both disks and drives in the tag description;
- cassette-tape nominally refers to the media, but some questions are actually about the drives, like Reviving the Cassette Port on an XT Clone Motherboard or Upping the speed of the VIC-20 tape drive: aftermarket hardware for the expansion port with "rabbit" in the name?;
- likewise the near-duplicate magnetic-tape, which has Which tape drives were the last to offer backward compatibility with QIC-150 Tape Cartridges?;
- game-cartridge has no corresponding “drive” tag either; although one could argue that this is because there is not really a drive there to speak of, we do have questions more about the slot interface than the cartridges themselves, like Commodore 64 - any way to safely plug in a cartridge when the power is on? or What causes the glitchy sound when a GBA cartridge is removed?.
If other formats can manage with just one tag for both drives and media, why can’t floppies?
I have no strong opinion on what the merged tag should be, so feel free to write an answer with your proposal – or one opposing the merge entirely.