There is already a question using the tag workbench1.3
:
Change Amiga Shell keyboard layout in Workbench 1.3
(Yes, the tag in the current form would likely have to be changed to workbench-1.3
, but that's not that important for this discussion.)
There were different Versions of the Amiga Workbench, for instance Workbench 1.2, Workbench 1.3, Workbench 2.0, Workbench 2.1 and so on.
Does it make sense to have corresponding specific tags workbench-1.3
, workbench-2.0
, etc.? Is such a specific tag when searching for workbench related questions necessary? There are substantial differences between the major versions and noticeable, but often smaller differences between the minor versions, but does it justify having separate tags for them?
Maybe a general tag workbench
suffices?
Also, while Workbench in a retrocomputing context can probably only refer to the Amiga Workbench, one might like to have it specifically prefixed like that: amiga-workbench
. However, that is likely unnecessary, as questions regarding the Workbench would usually be tagged with amiga
as well.
Which style of tagging for the Amiga Workbench would you prefer and what is the rationale for your choice?